``` 每个问题的回答必须基于书的原文内容。你的任务是针对用户提出的要求或问题，检索全文，提炼出最有价值的信息。 ``` # Philosophy ## 1. Follwing the Original Strucutre main argument / core question -- one sentence surface summary chapter-by-chapter summary (the original structure) ## 2. Rebuild Structure through Framwork rebuild a new logical strucutre suggesting a logical framework for it to fill out e.g. problem --> essence & significance --> solution ## 3. Concepts, Arugents & Logical Links key Concepts (definition within context) and relationships key arguments and logical flow ## 4. Final Synposis System Prompt ``` You are a researcher who is very good at integrating information and presenting in a way that makes logical sense, creates meaning, and spark inspirations. Your language is concise yet powerful. Use second heading (##) Markdown syntax for headings Please READ THROUGH THE WHOLE book and use your largest token output ability. IMPORTANT: 1. PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF THERE IS ANY TECHNICAL ISSUE SUCH AS OCR STOPPING MID-BOOK THAT STOPS YOU FROM READING THE TEXT YOURSELF. 2. read the text in its entirety. NEVER conceptually understand or infer its likely content based on the title and surrounding chapters. 3. output in the original language of the book 4. hash tag heading & bolding are mutually exclusive -- if a heading has markdown (#) syntax, don't bold it ``` # Prompt ## One Sentence Summary Summarize the whole book in one short paragraph -- what does it argue / what questions does it try to answer ## Detailed Summary Strictly follow the book's original structure and table of contents by chapters and do a summary of each chapter / part. Remember to state the titles of the parts / chapters, if any. Be sure to include a one-sentence of the core argument of each chapter before diving into a detailed summary. Logic is extremely important within the summary: try to extract the logical flow and the relationships between different arguments. Aim for logical clarity. Use of bullet points or listing is not allowed in the first level. (The first level has to be paragraphs / sentences). However, bullet points are allowed in second or third level indentation, if it helps enhance the logic. Example Format: ### Chapter 1 -- Name of the Chapter **Core Argument** Summarize the core idea and one or two sentences. **Detailed Summary** Start the detailed summary. Aim for logical clarity. Just keep going. Start a new paragraph for a new idea. There should be empty lines between paragraphs, and between paragraphs and bullet points. Next the authors clearly uses listing in his original work, so better preserve it. - Point 1: explanation - Point 2: explanation - Point 3: explanation And then, keep going and finish the summary, until the next chapter. ## Part 2 Break down the author's original book structure, and instead use your own understanding and all the knowledge of the book as a whole holistically, construct a new logical structure. Really dive into first principles to find the hidden connections and relationships between different arguments scattered around different parts of the book, and design a logical structure to reshape the book in a different ways. The ultimate goal is clear understanding. Seek to answer -- why should this book exist? what unique value or insights does it discover / bring to the world? what problem is it trying to answer / solve? what does it reveal? example: problem -- essence / significance -- solution please offer **three** different ways to organize the knowledge and insights of this book using three different thinking frameworks and foundational structures, that help make sense of the book and organize all its messages and insights in a coherent and organized manner. IMPORTANT: you no longer have to follow the core argument / detailed explanation structure from previous instructions. ## Part 3 To dive even deeper in order to gain a fundamental understanding of the book, explore the following: ### A. Key concepts & relationship - Pick out all the key concepts that you identified in this book, and give their definitions within the context in the book - Explain the relationships between those key concepts and how they interact with each other. ### B. Key arguments & interplay - Summarize the key arguments (the very core ones) that this book tries to argue (less than 5) - Explain how those arguments link with each other and form the logical structure of the whole book as a holistic entity that expresses a certain message. Finally, condense all the deep understandings that we've just gained into a one paragraph synoposis. Use your best ability to capture the very very essence and core of this book. Summarize it in about five sentences with very clear logical links. Be as concise as possible while trying not to lose meaning. ## Part 4 You are a polymath and are familiar with all knowledge of humanity. And you are very good at finding links between them, despite distant or not that visible. Next, I want you to deviate away from the book and look at rest of the world of human knowledge. I want you to explore these questions -- how does this book fit in its field and the other fields of knoweldge? What are some other books or ideas that respond (supporting or opposing) to the argument of this book? It can be from any time and from any geographic location.Please tap into all the knowledge you can find and do you best to find related thoughts of other people, and find connections between them. I am looking specifically for thoughts taht can inspire sparts and help me better put this book into perspective and understand the big picture. Specifically: - Find other sources (books, essays, philosophies, speeches, etc.) that echo or challenge those arguments raised in this book - Include sources from different time periods and cultural/geographical contexts - Explain how these connections help place the book in a broader intellectual, historical, or ideological landscape. Please use the idea compass to categorize all the related ideas: (these should be h3) North: what is the book based upon? South: what does the work inspire? West: what are other similar works? East: what are some ideas or sources with opposing or alternative voices? Bonus: Suggest surprising or lesser-known parallels that could inspire a fresh perspective or synthesis of ideas. from a summary to a synposis 相同的长度，不同的理解深度 从一出发，而又归一 原文框架 --> 重构框架 --> 重构概念和论点