### Problem Description Obsidian users struggle to share their knowledge effectively. Existing solutions (Obsidian Publish, Digital Garden) have two key problems: 1. **High setup barrier**: Requires technical knowledge many users lack 2. **Static output only**: Visitors can only read passively—no interaction, discussion, or collaboration possible ## Problem Statement Individual Obsidian vaults are isolated silos. Users can only broadcast knowledge through static sites, preventing true knowledge exchange and collaborative learning. **Core tension**: While Obsidian prioritizes privacy (important), knowledge needs to flow, be discussed, and evolve through collaboration. No current solution balances both. **Target audience**: Obsidian users wanting to share knowledge and enable collaborative learning while maintaining vault privacy. --- Turn your knowledge from stock to flow 建立一个知识创造者和分享者都能够从中获益的生态 自己写笔记的同时，顺便能分享一点并从中获益。 自己灭有想法的时候，能够看看别人都写了些什么。 testing [[Dual Currency System -- Separate atoms & bits]] & Culture credits?? ==-- this is truly exciting== creating a new nation and designing a new economy -- the knowledge economy 如何判断一条笔记对读者的价值？ 读者用自己的 rating system 决定这条笔记值多少个 CC。 所有这些数据会被记录到读者自己的阅读历史的笔记库里 -- 所以如果他们想方便自己的未来检索（filter 这一年多过的最好的文章），they are incentivised to rate them fairly. --- ## Challenging Hypothesis 这些 Obsidian 用户，真的"渴望"分享吗？ "Interactive" 到底是什么意思？对创作者和参观者有什么好处？ --- ## 三步走战略 从 "比 Obsidian Publish 更简单更便宜的竞品" 的定位切入 加入更 interactive 的元素，强调知识的 connectivity & flow 随着人更多，慢慢演化出新的规则，经济，甚至社群政治 --- Obsidian for organizational knowledge sharing & collaboration 这是另一个竞争对手更加多的领域？ --- ## Chat with AI References [[Obsidianverse Ideation]] [[From Nex to Obsidianverse]]