Students still follow a very prescriptive format (claim + counterclaim) Some essay titles simple cannot be explored using this approach The new syllabus: points of view where *critically analyze* their arguments no need to put TOK concepts like a checklist avoid common examples justification underdeveloped encourage fresh, original examples draw from classroom expereincesa cross subjects or from personal knowledge to bring greater authenticity implications / broader consequences of their arguments question the assumptions and significance of the arguemnt being made > if this is true, then... > yet this seems to overlook... 12-point + double space ---